Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘tdd’

In part 1 we talked about naming as a process. We talked about how legacy code is really defined by its poor legibility, and that reading is the core of coding. And we talked about how working effectively with legacy code is simply the process of having an insight, writing it down, and checking it […]

Read Full Post »

My series about naming as a process is really about design. It focuses on design in legacy code. That has sparked people to ask about new code. What about new code? Why not start with intent? I was taught to pseudocode or model, so that I could focus on the intent first. Then I don’t need all […]

Read Full Post »

In part 1 we talked about naming as a process. We talked about how legacy code is really defined by its poor legibility, and that reading is the core of coding. And we talked about how working effectively with legacy code is simply the process of having an insight, writing it down, and checking it […]

Read Full Post »

In part 1 we talked about naming as a process. We talked about how legacy code is really defined by its poor legibility, and that reading is the core of coding. And we talked about how working effectively with legacy code is simply the process of having an insight, writing it down, and checking it […]

Read Full Post »

In part 1 we talked about naming as a process. We talked about how legacy code is really defined by its poor legibility, and that reading is the core of coding. And we talked about how working effectively with legacy code is simply the process of having an insight, writing it down, and checking it […]

Read Full Post »

In part 1 we talked about naming as a process. We talked about how legacy code is really defined by its poor legibility, and that reading is the core of coding. And we talked about how working effectively with legacy code is simply the process of having an insight, writing it down, and checking it […]

Read Full Post »

In part 1, we talked about naming as a process. We talked about how legacy code is really defined by its poor legibility, and that reading is the core of coding. And we talked about how working effectively with legacy code is simply the process of having an insight, writing it down, and checking it […]

Read Full Post »

Many people try to come up with a great name all at once. This is hard and rarely works well. The problem is that naming is design: it is picking the correct place for each thing and creating the right abstraction. Doing that perfectly the first time is unlikely. Let’s talk about evolutionary naming.

Read Full Post »

A manager recently asked me how to measure whether the teams were unit testing. He believes that they are. He has heard strong alignment among ICs and managers. He also knows that the teams have no way to see if they actually are unit testing or how well. He, like most people, asserted the use […]

Read Full Post »

I find one of the important early mind shifts to be a switch from thinking of unit tests as test to thinking of the set of all tests as your spec. If your spec is clean, you could delete your product code, hand it to someone, and they would implement the same product, with roughly […]

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »